User talk:Kepper66

Welcome!

Hello, Kepper66, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --User:Graeme Bartlett

Iowa Pix

Hi Kepper, if I get to Stone City I will be sure to take lots of pictures. It all depends on where my job sends me... Billwhittaker (talk) 21:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stone City

Thanks for your work on the estate page: some information still wasn't cited, but that was the last sentence. Since we don't need the touristy kind of information that it provided, I simply removed it.

A few things, by the way (forgive me if you already know these!): (1) the intro should have the title of the article bolded, and it shouldn't have a link. That's why I moved the link to Green himself. (2) Links in the See also section really should only be to things that aren't linked elsewhere in the article. For that reason I removed the links to Green and to Stone City but left the NRHP in Jones County link. (3) It's best to add "United States" to the location, as well as the community and the state, since this is a global encyclopedia.

Please don't take this as patronising: I simply want to help you do better, and anyway I've never worked with you except with Jones County/Stone City matters, so I don't know how much good you're capable of :-) Nyttend (talk) 13:36, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, good job..."Somewhere in your youth or childhood" :-) Nyttend (talk) 15:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Map

Could you provide a source for File:Map of Stone City.jpg? Did you make it, or did you get it from somewhere? Nyttend (talk) 16:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Red Stone.JPG

File:Red Stone.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Red Stone.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Red Stone.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 05:12, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

National Register of Historic Places listings in Marshall County, Iowa

How do you know that it's on the list? Searching for "church" at http://nrhp.focus.nps.gov, the official NR database, produces no results, and the same is true of a search for "scientist". If we can prove that a site was listed at one time and has never been removed, we include it even if it's been destroyed; however, we need to be able to prove that it's been listed. Nyttend (talk) 12:39, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't trust that website. It presents itself as the official website, but it's not at all, and it's several years out of date. Looking through the database more clearly, it turns out that the church was once listed on the Register, but it was removed more than a decade ago. I'll add a note saying that it was formerly listed; thanks. Nyttend (talk) 17:05, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It turns out that there's an article on it — First Church of Christ, Scientist (Marshalltown, Iowa). Nyttend (talk) 17:09, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What needs to be done? Nyttend (talk) 17:20, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen both parts of this split discussion here and at User talk:Nyttend. Just to corroborate what Nyttend has said, the www.nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com website, which i refer to as "NRHP.COM" is a private website mostly echoing the public domain NRIS database. However, its programmer(s) misunderstood some of the database's info, and, among other errors, it routinely shows as NRHP-listed on a given date, any property that was actually de-listed or had some other status change on that date. So Nyttend and i and other NRHP editors prefer to use the NRIS tools' NRHP infobox generator interface provided by User:Elkman. That interface shows "listing code is DR" for this item. DR means "DATE RECEIVED/PENDING NOMINATION" so that indicates it is not NRHP-listed per the database, though, oddly, per key to those codes at wp:NRHPhelp. It should show "RN" for removed from Register, I would think, but anyhow the main thing is that its status is that it is not currently listed. Oops, i was looking at entry for a different Iowa church of this name; the code is in fact RN for this one. Not sure if this helps, just corroborating. --doncram (talk) 18:03, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stone City Pic

You wrote:

Thanks for the new pic of the General Store at Stone City, Iowa. Funny thing though; I click on the image and it does not come up in it's file page. Strange?? Did you get any other immages from around town as well? Kepper66 (talk) 11:35, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kep: I took about 5 or 6 total, most are crummy, during a drive-thru after Pumpkin Fest at Anamosa. The Mrs. tolerates my hobby, but I don't dare push my luck when she and our son are in the car. It probably took a while to upload because it it ca. 10 mb. Bill Whittaker (talk) 00:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Project Iowa news

GOOD NEWS The division of Wikipedia:WikiProject Iowa
called Wikipedia:WikiProject Iowa/Communities
has been activated.

Hi, you are receiving this notice because you are a member of WikiProject Iowa. I hope you will take the time to check out the developing division called Communities (pre-named and previously red-linked). I have seen your username many times since I self appointed myself as a page patroller of Iowa Communities. I / we in Iowa sure could use your help. Keep up the good work.
Please click on the links in the GOOD NEWS notice. RifeIdeas Talk 23:12, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marshalltown edits

Hi, I started to patrol all the communities of Iowa in early/mid December, and noticed you adding many contributions to Stone City and Marshalltown. Until today I was in complete agreement with your edits. Today you had added information to Marshalltown, Iowa which is great. One of the changes was to what is now called the Notable people section. You somehow was unaware of the message that was placed beside the header in the Wiki edit code stating:

You can see this at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline and read the several discussions starting in Sept 2007 at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline. I undid the Notable natives back to Notable people.

In your work with the section Education I refer you to read the official Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Bulleted and numbered lists and/or the easier to understand but unofficial User:Tony1/Beginners' guide to the Manual of Style which I find very helpful. In the Sister cities section you deleted the sister cities but left the rest. Do you have definitive proof that the information was incorrect and there is no sister cities for Marshalltown? I see you have been active almost daily, therefore I will give it a week before I undo this edits giving you the opportunity to rework these yourself.

I also am taking this opportunity to invite you again to visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Iowa/Communities which I and others from Project Iowa are building as a guideline for improving the cities, townships, counties and other communities in the state of Iowa.
--RifeIdeas Talk 23:45, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My bad about the sister city deleting, I see you just made them a bulleted list from a prose sentence. Looking at other articles to get ideas is a good idea as long as they are GA (Good Article) or FA (Featured Article) Class. A good example would be Grand Forks, North Dakota, notice the gold star at the top right corner of the article - that is the mark of an FA article. If you read a published book encyclopedia you would rarely see any bulleted lists. I too made (and still make) "mistakes" when it comes to editing but as long as you/we are willing to improve our editing skills Wikipedia will only get better. As far as finding sources for the sister cities newspapers are just fine, of course online "permanent" sources are preferred. Wiki MOS for references can be found at WP:NOTES. I prefer to use the cite templates WP:CITET which covers using references from the web to video games including newspapers. I have to admit I also changed Notable people to Notable Natives and residents thinking it was better until it was pointed out to me that there was a guideline that had been laid out though consensus of editors who have been working on Wikipedia for a while. In regards to deleting the people not meeting the criteria I say we give people some time to make articles (two months I think) that is why there is a date hidden in the code (2010/12/13) of when I separated out the list. I see you joined Communities, I just wanted to say thank you and ask you if the page is easy to understand? A new set of eyes looking at any article or project can see things that the original writer just does not see (that is why they have copy editors for books). There is more to come as I get the time. Currently I am working on a new section to explain about the coordinates used because we learned we were not doing them correctly in new township articles being made.
--RifeIdeas Talk 13:30, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, Kepper66! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 20:46, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tweak "Mosques in the Ukraine" template?

Greetings, your template "Mosques in the Ukraine" has some category encoded that makes every article its in appear in Category:Islam in the Ukraine. This causes redundancies, as Category:Mosques in the Ukraine is itself already under said cat. Can you tweak that to allow the mosques themselves to show up just in the "Mosques in the Ukraine" category? MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Glick-Sower House

Good work on this articles creation.SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow? (talk) 09:29, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NRHP Photo Contest

Just a reminder that the WP:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Fall 2011 Photo Contest

will start on Friday, October 21.

Smallbones (talk) 22:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

--Kumioko (talk) 02:40, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Google satellite view

You can upload Google satellite screenshots to a few Wikimedia websites, including the English Wikipedia, but only a few: Google satellite images are copyrighted and not freely licensed, so you may only upload them under claims of fair use, and most Wikimedia websites do not accept claims of fair use. Moreover, you'll find it extremely hard to find a situation in which you could properly claim fair use of a Google satellite image — I suppose that it would be reasonable to upload such an image for the "Satellite view" section of Google Maps, but any other use would have almost no chance of passing the fair use criteria. Nyttend (talk) 03:30, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Crimea towns

Sorry, sir, you are wrong! Bakhchisaray is a town («small city»). -- А.Крымов (talk) 19:26, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

McNary

Hi Kepper66, I noticed at the National Registery of Historic Places project that you are interested in the history of eastern Arizona. I wondered if you have had much chance to study McNary or Whiteriver, AZ? Taram (talk) 07:17, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kepper66. You have new messages at Ezhiki's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kepper66. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photo requests for Amana or Postville?

Do you do photo requests for Amana or Postville?

Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 03:34, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kepper66. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kepper66. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]